.png)
.webp)
As one of the pioneering founders of Hewlett-Packard, David Packard enjoyed immense success in establishing the company as an innovative force in technology over his decades of leadership.
However, he also faced challenges in adapting HP to rapidly evolving consumer markets and fending off competitive pressures from emerging players like Compaq and Dell.
Though deeply respected for his technical expertise and steady guidance, Packard's traditional management style was sometimes seen as outdated during HP's difficult transition into the personal computing age.
William Hewlett's technical brilliance shaped Hewlett-Packard's early success via inventions like audio oscillators and scientific calculators.
Yet as computing transformed the technology landscape in the 1970s and 1980s, his methodical, engineering-focused approach clashed with the rapid innovation needed to compete in personal computing.
While his co-founder David Packard embraced bold changes, Hewlett was Hell bent on sticking with HP's traditional research culture—prioritizing careful development over speed.
This led to his downfall.
As HP's first outside CEO, John Young led the company into an era of accelerated growth and diversification, overseeing major expansions in computing, printing, and medical products.
However, he focused heavily on high-volume, low-margin businesses which eroded HP's gold-standard reputation for quality and technical innovation.
While credited with transforming the insular "HP Way" culture, Young's hard-charging leadership style also led to a contentious relationship with co-founder Bill Hewlett.
His ambitious vision brought needed change, but at the cost of alienating HP traditionalists and shifting the company's identity.
As the heir to the HP Way culture nurtured by the company's founders, Lewis Platt sought to restore HP's reputation for quality and employee dedication while continuing the broader market expansion that began under his predecessor.
However, Platt struggled to keep pace with the breakneck speed of technological change in the 1990s, failing to position HP as an early leader in key trends like e-commerce, business software, and Internet infrastructure.
Though largely popular internally, his cautious and deliberative leadership was ill-suited to HP's need for bold vision during the dot-com frenzy.
Platt provided a steady hand but lacked the disruptive spark to vault HP to the top of a rapidly evolving IT landscape.
Carly Fiorina took over at HP in 1999 as its first external CEO, tasked with steering the company through the internet revolution.
She launched sweeping changes.
HP needed to switch from a traditional hardware manufacturer into a digital-age competitor.
Fiorina launched a bunch of needed reforms—from aggressive cost-cutting to radical cultural shifts—sparking intense resistance within HP's ranks.
Her push to acquire Compaq for $25 billion marked the peak of this tension, dividing shareholders and firing 67,000 workers.
Fiorina's promises of market dominance and surging profits fell short.
Revenue growth stalled.
Stock prices dropped.
And the board terminated her in 2005.
As HP's chief financial officer, Robert Wayman provided steady and reassuring leadership during a turbulent period following Carly Fiorina's ouster.
While only serving briefly in an interim capacity, Wayman healed rifts from the polarizing Fiorina era and rebuilt strained ties with employees and partners.
However, his short tenure left lingering strategic questions unanswered.
The company needed a dynamic new CEO to plot HP's future course.
As a caretaker steward, Wayman supplied stability but lacked the sweeping vision to remake HP for the new Millenium.
As a highly regarded operations guru from NCR, Mark Hurd brought order and fiscal discipline to post-Fiorina HP through aggressive cost reductions and a relentless focus on execution.
While lauded for his bold vision and mastery of complex details, Hurd's hard-nosed management style and uncompromising demands also caused rifts both internally and with partners.
Under his leadership, profits and share price rose sharply but at the expense of the innovative culture nurtured for decades by HP's founders.
While turning finances around in the near term, Hurd failed to transition HP's fading hardware model into high-growth software and services markets, leaving it strategically adrift amid shifting IT trends.
Moving up the HP ranks, Cathie Lesjak provided steady leadership during a stormy interim period following Mark Hurd's shocking ouster over ethics violations.
Lesjak stabilized a stunned company, putting in new policies to focus on transparency and accountability to restore morale.
A capable caretaker in chaotic times, Lesjak supplied pragmatic guidance but lacked the vision to correct HP's aimless trajectory.
As an enterprise software veteran from SAP, Léo Apotheker brought an outsider's perspective to the flagging hardware giant with an aggressive plan to transform HP into a high-margin software and services leader.
However, his disruptive strategy and expensive acquisition decisions alienated customers and investors seeking stability amid market realignments.
Though hired to sharpen strategy, Apotheker's unpredictable lurches into new markets while lacking intimate operational knowledge of HP proved disastrous.
His 11-month tenure ended in flames as directors lost faith in his ability to effectively execute the jarring transformation plan he charted which failed to leverage HP's existing strengths.
As a former CEO of eBay and corporate board veteran, Meg Whitman lent operational prowess and steady leadership to the chaos-ridden tech giant following Leo Apotheker’s stormy exit.
While failing in her five-year goal to restore robust revenue growth and industry leadership, Whitman did oversee much-needed strategic focus after years of aimless acquisition sprees.
However, critics point to her background shortcomings in enterprise hardware and reluctance to make needed cuts during disruption as factors that inhibited bolder innovation.
Though highly respected, Whitman put out fires but lacked the disruptive product vision that may have returned HP to its former glory.
As a company veteran well-versed in its current business model, Enrique Lores brought much-needed stability and pragmatic leadership in his mission to streamline operations and sharpen HP's competitiveness during a challenging market realignment.
However, three years into his tenure, Lores has yet to articulate and execute a disruptive vision that transitions HP into higher growth opportunities better suited to evolving IT landscapes.
While stemming previous chaos, his plan for incremental optimization fails to reestablish the ambitious pace of industry leadership or innovation set by HP's pioneering founders.
Respected yet seen as uninspiring, Lores offers reliable stewardship but not necessarily groundbreaking transformation.
.png){kind=logo}
.webp)
.webp)